Enatega Admin: Fix Unexpected Redirects After Store Delete

Hey guys! We've got a bit of a situation on our hands with the Enatega Admin Dashboard. It seems like there's a quirky bug causing some unexpected page refreshes and redirects when deleting stores. Let's dive into the details, figure out what's going on, and hopefully get this squashed soon!

Describe the Bug

So, here's the deal: when you're deleting a store under a specific vendor in the Enatega Admin Dashboard, things get a little wonky. Instead of smoothly removing the store and staying put, the page unexpectedly refreshes and redirects you to a completely different vendor's store page. Imagine the confusion and potential for errors this could cause! It's like you're trying to tidy up one room, and suddenly you're teleported to another, entirely different room. This unexpected behavior throws a wrench in the store management workflow, making it frustrating and inefficient. You see, as an admin, you expect a certain level of predictability when managing your vendors and their stores. Deleting a store should be a straightforward process: click delete, confirm, and the store is gone, with the page reflecting the updated list. However, this bug disrupts that flow, leading to a jarring experience. It's crucial to address this issue promptly because it not only affects the user experience but also raises concerns about data integrity and the overall reliability of the dashboard. Think about the implications if admins accidentally delete stores from the wrong vendor due to this confusion! The goal is to create a seamless and intuitive experience for admins, allowing them to manage their vendors and stores with confidence. This means eliminating unexpected behaviors and ensuring that actions have predictable outcomes. Fixing this bug is a significant step towards achieving that goal.

Steps to Reproduce

Okay, so how can we make this bug happen ourselves? Follow these steps, and you should see the issue:

1. Go to the Enatega Admin Dashboard. This is our starting point, the central hub for managing all things Enatega.
2. Click on 'Vendors' from the general dropdown. This is where we navigate to the vendor management section, where we can see a list of all our vendors.
3. Now select a vendor. Once you've clicked on 'Vendors,' you'll see a list of vendors. Choose the vendor whose stores you want to manage.
4. The vendor's stores will show up on the right. After selecting a vendor, their associated stores should appear, allowing you to view and manage them.
5. See error now delete a store you will see the page unexpectedly refreshes and redirects the user to a different vendor's store page. This occurs immediately after the delete action. This is where the magic (or rather, the bug) happens. Try deleting a store, and you should witness the unexpected redirect. Instead of staying on the current vendor's store list, the page will refresh and take you to a different vendor's store page. It's like a surprise trip to another vendor's territory! This sequence of actions consistently triggers the bug, making it relatively easy to reproduce and test. By following these steps, developers and testers can reliably observe the issue and work towards a solution. The clarity of these steps is crucial for effective bug reporting and resolution. The more detailed and precise the reproduction steps are, the easier it is for developers to understand the problem and implement a fix. This ensures that the fix addresses the root cause of the issue and prevents it from recurring in the future.

Expected Behavior

Ideally, after deleting a store from Vendor A's store list, the system should remain right there, showing the updated list without the deleted store. It's like removing a book from a shelf – you expect the shelf to simply show the remaining books, not to transport you to a different library altogether! This is the kind of smooth, intuitive experience we're aiming for. The expected behavior is all about maintaining context and minimizing disruptions. When an admin deletes a store, they expect to see the immediate result of their action – the store disappearing from the list. There should be no unexpected redirects, no page refreshes that take them away from their current task. This helps to ensure a seamless and efficient workflow. Imagine the frustration of having to navigate back to the correct vendor's page every time you delete a store! It's a waste of time and effort, and it can easily lead to mistakes. By adhering to the principle of least astonishment, we can create a system that behaves in a predictable and intuitive way. This means that the system should do what the user expects it to do, without any surprises. In the case of deleting a store, the user expects the store to be deleted and the page to reflect that change, without any unnecessary redirects or refreshes. This expected behavior is not just about aesthetics; it's about functionality and usability. It's about creating a dashboard that empowers admins to manage their stores effectively and efficiently, without being hindered by unexpected bugs and behaviors.

Video Evidence

We even have a video (multivendor-admin.enatega.com_general_vendors.-.Google.Chrome.2025-03-20.09-55-27.1.mp4) showcasing this weirdness in action. Seeing is believing, right? This video provides visual evidence of the bug, making it even clearer what's going on. Sometimes, a written description just doesn't capture the full picture. A video, on the other hand, can show the exact sequence of events, the unexpected redirects, and the overall disruption to the user experience. This visual aid is incredibly helpful for developers when they're trying to understand the bug and come up with a fix. It's like having a front-row seat to the issue, allowing them to see exactly what the user is experiencing. The video not only confirms the existence of the bug but also provides valuable context. It shows the specific steps that lead to the issue, the speed at which the redirect occurs, and any other relevant details that might be missed in a written report. This comprehensive information makes the debugging process much more efficient and effective. By including the video, we're not just saying there's a bug; we're showing it. This level of detail and transparency is crucial for building trust and ensuring that the issue is addressed promptly and thoroughly.

Desktop Environment

• OS: [e.g., Windows] (Please specify your OS)
• Browser: [e.g., Chrome] (Please specify your browser)
• Version: [e.g., Latest] (Please specify your browser version)

It's important to know the environment where this bug is happening. This helps narrow down the potential causes and ensure the fix works for everyone. When reporting a bug, it's crucial to provide as much detail as possible about the environment in which it occurs. This includes the operating system, browser, and browser version, as well as any other relevant software or hardware configurations. The more information you provide, the easier it is for developers to reproduce the bug and identify its root cause. For example, a bug that occurs only in a specific browser version might indicate a compatibility issue, while a bug that occurs only on a particular operating system might suggest a problem with the platform-specific code. By specifying the desktop environment, we can help developers focus their efforts on the areas that are most likely to be causing the issue. This saves time and resources and ensures that the fix is targeted and effective. In addition to the operating system, browser, and browser version, it's also helpful to provide information about the device's hardware, such as the CPU, memory, and graphics card. This can be particularly relevant for performance-related bugs or issues that involve complex graphics or animations. The key is to provide as much context as possible so that developers have a clear understanding of the environment in which the bug is occurring. This will greatly increase the chances of a successful bug fix.

Let's Get This Sorted!

Hopefully, this detailed report helps the team get to the bottom of this redirecting issue. It's a bit of a headache, but with clear information, we can hopefully get it resolved quickly and efficiently. Thanks for your patience, guys! The process of identifying and reporting bugs is crucial for maintaining the quality and reliability of any software application. When users encounter issues, it's important to document them thoroughly and provide as much information as possible to the development team. This includes a clear description of the bug, steps to reproduce it, the expected behavior, and details about the environment in which it occurred. By following these best practices, we can help developers understand the problem and come up with a fix. Effective bug reporting not only benefits the users but also the development team. It saves time and resources by providing clear and actionable information, which reduces the need for back-and-forth communication and speeds up the debugging process. A well-documented bug report is a valuable asset that helps developers prioritize their work and address the most pressing issues first. In addition to reporting bugs, it's also important to provide feedback on the overall user experience. This can include suggestions for improvements, feature requests, and comments on the usability of the application. User feedback is essential for shaping the future of the product and ensuring that it meets the needs of its users. By working together, users and developers can create a better software experience for everyone.