Solve 4^(log_2 (cube Root(2√2))^2) A Step-by-Step Guide

by Chloe Fitzgerald 56 views

Hey there, math enthusiasts! Ever stumbled upon a problem that looks like it's written in a secret code? Well, today, we're diving deep into one such equation and cracking it open step by step. We're tackling the challenge of calculating 4^(log_2 (∧(1/3)(2√2))^2). Sounds intimidating? Don't worry, by the end of this article, you'll not only know the answer but also understand the logic behind it. So, let's put on our thinking caps and get started!

Unraveling the Mystery: Step-by-Step Solution

1. The Initial Setup: Making Sense of the Equation

Okay, guys, let's break this down. The problem we're facing is 4^(log_2 (∧(1/3)(2√2))^2). At first glance, it might seem like a jumble of numbers and symbols, but trust me, it's more approachable than it looks. The key here is to tackle it piece by piece, starting from the innermost parts and working our way outwards. We're dealing with exponents, logarithms, and radicals – all fundamental concepts in algebra. To really nail this, we need to be comfortable with how these elements interact with each other. Think of it like solving a puzzle; each step is a piece that fits into the larger picture. We'll start by simplifying the term inside the parenthesis, then address the square root and the exponent, and finally, we'll deal with the logarithm and the outer exponent. Remember, patience is key in mathematics, especially when dealing with complex expressions. Don't rush the process; take your time to understand each step, and the solution will reveal itself. With a systematic approach, even the most daunting problems become manageable. So, let's roll up our sleeves and dive into the first layer of this mathematical onion!

2. Simplifying the Innermost Term: 2√2

Let's zoom in on the heart of our problem: simplifying 2√2. This is where we get our hands dirty with some basic radical manipulation. Remember, √2 is just shorthand for 2^(1/2), which is a crucial piece of the puzzle. When we see 2√2, we're essentially looking at 2 multiplied by the square root of 2. Now, to make things even clearer, we can rewrite the number 2 itself as 2^1. This might seem like a minor change, but it sets us up for a smooth combination using exponent rules. The rule we're going to use here is one of the most fundamental in algebra: when you multiply numbers with the same base, you add their exponents. So, 2^1 * 2^(1/2) becomes 2^(1 + 1/2). Adding those exponents together, 1 + 1/2 equals 3/2. And boom! We've transformed 2√2 into the much simpler 2^(3/2). This might seem like a small victory, but it's a significant step towards unraveling the whole problem. By expressing everything in terms of exponents, we're setting ourselves up to use the powerful tools of exponential and logarithmic manipulation later on. This is a common strategy in math – breaking down complex terms into their simplest forms to reveal underlying patterns and make calculations easier. So, give yourself a pat on the back; we've just cleared the first hurdle!

3. Tackling the Cube Root: (2√2)^(1/3)

Now that we've simplified 2√2 to 2^(3/2), let's move on to the next layer of our mathematical onion: the cube root. We're looking at (2√2)^(1/3), which, thanks to our previous simplification, we can rewrite as (2(3/2))(1/3). Remember, guys, a cube root is just raising something to the power of 1/3. The beauty here lies in the power of exponents. When you raise a power to another power, you simply multiply the exponents. It's like a mathematical shortcut that can save us a ton of time and effort. So, (2(3/2))(1/3) transforms into 2^((3/2) * (1/3)). Now it's just a matter of multiplying those fractions. Multiplying 3/2 by 1/3 gives us 3/6, which simplifies beautifully to 1/2. So, what we have now is 2^(1/2). If that looks familiar, it's because it is! 2^(1/2) is just another way of writing the square root of 2, or √2. We've successfully navigated the cube root, and in doing so, we've further simplified our expression. We're getting closer and closer to the heart of the problem, and each simplification makes the path ahead clearer. This step highlights the elegance of using exponent rules to tackle complex expressions. By converting radicals to exponents and applying these rules, we can transform seemingly complicated problems into manageable steps. So, keep that exponent multiplication rule in your toolkit; it's a lifesaver!

4. Squaring the Result: (2(1/2))2

Alright, team, we're making some serious headway! We've simplified the innermost terms and navigated the cube root. Now, let's tackle the squaring operation. We're looking at (2(1/2))2, and this step is actually quite elegant in its simplicity. Remember that exponent rule we used earlier, where raising a power to another power means multiplying the exponents? Well, it's going to shine again here. We have 2^(1/2) raised to the power of 2. So, we multiply the exponents: (1/2) * 2. And what does that give us? Just 1! So, (2(1/2))2 simplifies down to 2^1, which is, of course, just 2. That's right, all that complexity inside the parentheses has boiled down to a single, humble number: 2. This step is a fantastic illustration of how seemingly complex expressions can often be simplified dramatically with the right application of mathematical rules. It's like peeling away the layers of an onion, and we've just removed a big one. Now, with the inside of the parentheses simplified to 2, we're in a much stronger position to tackle the logarithm and the final exponent. The key takeaway here is the power of simplification. By breaking down the problem into smaller, manageable steps and applying the relevant rules, we can transform a daunting challenge into a series of straightforward calculations. So, let's carry this momentum forward and conquer the remaining steps!

5. Evaluating the Logarithm: log_2(2)

Okay, mathletes, it's time to face the logarithm! After all our hard work simplifying the inner parts of the equation, we've arrived at log_2(2). Now, if logarithms make you break out in a cold sweat, fear not! This one is actually quite friendly. Remember, the logarithm is just asking a simple question: