BOE's Bailey Calls For Closer EU Trade Ties To Mitigate Brexit's Economic Impact

Chloe Fitzgerald

5 min read

Post on May 31, 2025

4.0

Share

The Economic Realities of Brexit: A Case for Closer Trade Relations

The UK's departure from the EU has undeniably had a significant negative impact on its economy. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates that Brexit will reduce the UK’s long-run productivity by 4%. This represents a considerable blow to the nation's economic potential. The consequences are multifaceted and far-reaching, impacting various sectors and leading to a noticeable economic downturn.

• Increased trade barriers and tariffs: New customs checks and tariffs have increased the cost of importing and exporting goods, disrupting established supply chains and impacting businesses reliant on EU trade.
• Reduced access to the EU single market: The UK's departure from the single market has resulted in significant regulatory divergence, limiting access to this lucrative market and hindering growth in various sectors, particularly financial services.
• Supply chain disruptions and labor shortages: Brexit has exacerbated existing supply chain vulnerabilities, leading to shortages of goods and labor in key industries, contributing to inflationary pressures.
• Negative impact on GDP growth: Various economic analyses indicate a measurable reduction in GDP growth directly attributable to Brexit-related factors, including reduced trade and investment. The impact varies across sectors and regions, with some more heavily exposed than others.

Bailey's Proposal: Strengthening UK-EU Trade Links

Andrew Bailey's recent statements advocate for a significant shift in the UK's approach to EU trade relations. Recognizing the substantial negative economic consequences of Brexit, he has implicitly proposed seeking a more collaborative and pragmatic relationship with the EU to minimize these effects. While not explicitly calling for rejoining the EU single market or customs union, his emphasis on closer trade ties suggests a desire for more integrated economic cooperation.

• Potential areas for improved cooperation: Bailey's implied suggestions likely encompass multiple areas, including streamlining financial services regulations to facilitate easier cross-border transactions and easing customs procedures to reduce friction in goods trade.
• Suggestions for reducing trade barriers and streamlining customs procedures: This could involve negotiating new trade agreements or revising existing ones to reduce tariffs and non-tariff barriers, potentially adopting technology to improve the efficiency of customs processes.
• Emphasis on mitigating negative economic impacts on specific sectors: Certain sectors, such as agriculture, fishing, and manufacturing, have been disproportionately affected by Brexit. Bailey's proposal might highlight the need for targeted measures to mitigate these sector-specific challenges through closer trade cooperation.

Challenges and Obstacles to Closer Trade Ties

Despite the potential economic benefits, closer UK-EU trade ties face significant political hurdles. The legacy of Brexit continues to cast a long shadow, with deep-seated disagreements and mistrust lingering between both sides.

• Northern Ireland Protocol issues: The ongoing dispute surrounding the Northern Ireland Protocol remains a major obstacle. Resolving this complex issue is crucial for building trust and fostering a more positive trading relationship.
• Differing regulatory standards: Divergent regulatory frameworks create friction and barriers to trade. Aligning standards in key areas would require political will and compromise from both sides.
• Potential opposition from within the UK government or political parties: Certain factions within the UK government and political landscape remain staunchly opposed to closer ties with the EU, posing significant political challenges to any efforts towards greater trade cooperation.
• Concerns about national sovereignty: Some within the UK government and public express concerns that closer trade ties would compromise national sovereignty. Addressing these concerns requires transparent and respectful dialogue.

Potential Benefits of Increased UK-EU Trade Cooperation

Despite the challenges, the potential upsides of increased UK-EU trade cooperation are substantial. A more collaborative approach could unlock significant economic benefits for both sides.

• Increased economic growth and investment: Reduced trade barriers and improved market access would likely stimulate economic growth and attract greater foreign investment.
• Reduced prices for consumers: Increased competition and reduced import costs could translate into lower prices for consumers.
• Improved supply chain resilience: Closer ties could enhance supply chain resilience, reducing vulnerability to disruptions.
• Enhanced international competitiveness: A stronger trading relationship with the EU would position the UK more competitively on the global stage.

Conclusion: The Importance of Re-evaluating the UK-EU Trade Relationship

Brexit's negative economic impact is undeniable, and the need for a pragmatic approach to mitigating these consequences is paramount. Andrew Bailey's call for closer UK-EU trade ties, while facing significant challenges, represents a crucial step in re-evaluating the post-Brexit relationship. While political hurdles remain substantial, exploring avenues for increased economic cooperation holds the potential for significant mutual gains. The potential benefits of reduced trade friction, enhanced economic growth, and improved supply chain resilience outweigh the challenges. The need for a renewed approach to UK-EU trade is clear. Let's continue the conversation about mitigating Brexit's economic impact through closer trade ties.