Britain And Australia's Hypocrisy: Sanctions On Myanmar's Military, But Ignoring Opposition Groups

Chloe Fitzgerald

5 min read

Post on May 13, 2025

4.5

Share

Sanctions Targeting the Myanmar Military Junta

Britain and Australia, alongside many other nations, have implemented targeted sanctions against the Myanmar military in response to the February 2021 coup and the subsequent brutal crackdown on pro-democracy movements. These Myanmar military sanctions are designed to exert international pressure on the Tatmadaw and hold them accountable for their actions.

• Examples of Sanctions: These sanctions encompass a range of measures, including asset freezes targeting senior military officials and their associates, travel bans preventing implicated individuals from entering UK and Australian territory, and arms embargoes aimed at restricting the military's access to weapons.
• Documented Atrocities: The rationale for these sanctions rests on irrefutable evidence of widespread human rights violations, including the systematic killing of civilians, the arbitrary detention and torture of political opponents, and the perpetration of ethnic cleansing against minority groups, particularly the Rohingya. Reports from organizations like Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the UN Human Rights Council detail these atrocities in harrowing detail.
• International Condemnation: The international community has overwhelmingly condemned the military junta’s actions. The sanctions imposed by Britain and Australia reflect this broad consensus and aim to contribute to a coordinated international response.

Alleged Abuses by Certain Myanmar Opposition Groups

While the Myanmar military's culpability is undeniable, it is crucial to acknowledge credible allegations of human rights abuses committed by some armed ethnic groups and other opposition factions fighting against the junta. These allegations, which require thorough and impartial investigation, often involve clashes with civilians, displacement, and other human rights violations. It's important to stress that these alleged abuses in no way justify the military's actions; rather, they highlight the multifaceted and tragic nature of the conflict.

• Specific Examples: Reports from various sources, including local NGOs and international organizations, cite instances of violence against civilians, recruitment of child soldiers, and other human rights violations by certain elements within the resistance movement. The complexity of the situation often makes verification challenging, but the allegations cannot be ignored.
• Acknowledging Complexity: The conflict in Myanmar is incredibly complex, involving numerous actors with varying agendas and levels of accountability. Attributing responsibility for specific incidents can be difficult, and accusations require careful scrutiny.
• Lack of Consistent Condemnation: The relative lack of strong and consistent condemnation from Britain and Australia regarding these alleged abuses by opposition groups, compared to their robust response to the military's atrocities, creates the perception of a double standard in their Myanmar sanctions policy.

The Double Standard and its Implications

The disparity in response to human rights abuses committed by the military junta versus those allegedly perpetrated by certain opposition groups raises questions about the underlying motivations and priorities of British and Australian foreign policy. This perceived selective justice undermines the credibility of international efforts to promote human rights and accountability in Myanmar.

• Potential Explanations: Several factors could contribute to this discrepancy. Strategic considerations, political alliances, and the challenges of navigating a complex conflict all play a role. However, these explanations do not diminish the perception of hypocrisy.
• Impact on Credibility: The inconsistency in applying pressure weakens the international community's moral authority and makes it harder to build trust among various stakeholders in Myanmar. A perception of bias fuels resentment and hampers efforts toward a peaceful resolution.
• Effect on the Peace Process: An uneven approach to accountability risks further escalating the violence and hindering any prospect of meaningful peace negotiations. A just and lasting peace requires accountability for all perpetrators of human rights abuses.

Calls for a More Balanced Approach

To achieve a just and sustainable peace in Myanmar, Britain and Australia must adopt a more balanced and consistent approach to addressing human rights violations. Selective justice only serves to prolong the conflict and undermine the credibility of international actors.

• Investigations into all Abuses: Independent and impartial investigations into abuses committed by all parties, including the military junta and the alleged perpetrators within opposition groups, are essential.
• Accountability for All Perpetrators: Holding all those responsible for human rights abuses accountable, regardless of their affiliation, is crucial for building trust and fostering reconciliation.
• Steps for a Balanced Approach: Britain and Australia should publicly condemn all documented human rights violations, irrespective of the perpetrator. They should also support robust international investigations and mechanisms to ensure accountability for all actors involved in the conflict. Furthermore, they should consider expanding their sanctions to include individuals and entities from opposition groups credibly accused of human rights violations, while continuing the pressure on the military junta.

Conclusion

Britain and Australia's selective application of sanctions in Myanmar reveals a troubling double standard. While the military junta's atrocities undeniably necessitate strong condemnation and sanctions, the relative silence regarding abuses by some opposition groups undermines the credibility of their Myanmar sanctions policy and hinders efforts towards a just and lasting peace. This inconsistent approach fuels cynicism, undermines trust, and perpetuates the cycle of violence. We must demand a more even-handed and effective Myanmar sanctions policy, one that prioritizes accountability for all human rights violations and promotes a path toward genuine reconciliation and a just peace. Contact your representatives to voice your concerns about the current inconsistent Myanmar sanctions policy and advocate for fair and effective sanctions that address abuses by all parties involved in the conflict.