The Cormier-Jones Feud: Why It Persists According To A Former UFC Contender

Chloe Fitzgerald

4 min read

Post on May 30, 2025

4.4

Share

The Origins of the Cormier-Jones Conflict: A History of Heated Battles

The Cormier-Jones feud isn't a spontaneous combustion; it's a carefully constructed bonfire built over years of intense competition and personal clashes. The initial sparks ignited during a 2014 altercation at a UFC event, stemming from a perceived slight and escalating into a physical confrontation. This was further fueled by Jones's subsequent vacating of the light heavyweight title due to a positive drug test – a controversy that cast a long shadow over his career and significantly impacted Cormier's path to the championship. Their subsequent fights, including Cormier's victories and Jones's controversial win, only deepened the rift.

The Role of Personality Clashes

The personalities of Cormier and Jones are diametrically opposed, fueling the fire of their rivalry. Their contrasting styles inside and outside the octagon contributed significantly to the intense dislike.

• Daniel Cormier: Known for his relentless work ethic, unwavering self-belief, and often outspoken nature. He's a highly respected wrestler with incredible heart and a strong, almost paternal, protective instinct over his title and reputation. He doesn't back down from a fight – verbally or physically.

• Jon Jones: Regarded as one of the most naturally talented fighters in UFC history, Jones possesses an almost effortless grace and skill in the octagon. However, his personality is often perceived as arrogant and aloof, further exacerbated by his numerous controversies outside of the cage. His defiance and seeming disregard for rules intensified the conflict.

This clash of personalities – the disciplined, outspoken Cormier versus the supremely gifted, yet controversial Jones – created an explosive mix that consistently reignited the flames.

Beyond the Octagon: The Fueling of the Feud Through Media and Social Media

The Cormier-Jones feud transcended the octagon, becoming a spectacle fueled by media narratives and social media interactions. Both fighters actively engaged in verbal sparring, escalating the conflict and keeping it in the public eye.

The Power of Public Perception

Media outlets played a crucial role in shaping public perception of the rivalry. Some narratives emphasized Jones's transgressions, painting Cormier as the wronged party; others focused on Cormier's aggressive behavior, creating a more nuanced picture. Fan opinions were fiercely divided, further fueling the intense emotional investment in the feud.

• Examples of inflammatory social media posts included direct insults, personal attacks, and the sharing of controversial past events.

• Different media outlets presented contrasting angles – some highlighting Jones's athletic dominance, others focusing on Cormier's resilience and ethical conduct.

The Business of the Feud

The enduring nature of the Cormier-Jones rivalry also has a significant business element. The sheer anticipation of a potential rematch (or even a simple social media exchange) guarantees significant media attention and pay-per-view (PPV) buys, generating substantial financial benefits for both fighters. This creates a powerful incentive to maintain the ongoing conflict.

A Former UFC Contender's Insight: Understanding the Enduring Nature of the Rivalry

Michael Bisping, a former UFC middleweight champion, offers a unique perspective on the enduring Cormier-Jones feud. According to Bisping, “It’s more than just a rivalry; it’s a deep-seated resentment. The weight-class issues, the failed drug tests – these aren’t easily forgotten.”

The Unresolved Issues

Bisping highlights several key unresolved issues contributing to the feud's persistence:

• The lingering resentment from Jones's past transgressions.
• The perceived injustice of Jones’s vacated titles.
• Unresolved competitive animosity.

The Psychological Aspects

Bisping emphasizes the psychological factors at play: “It's about ego, pride, and the need for validation. Both men are incredibly competitive, and the rivalry became a platform to prove their dominance, not just in the octagon, but also in the court of public opinion.”

Conclusion: The Cormier-Jones Feud: A Legacy of Rivalry and its Unlikely End?

The Cormier-Jones feud is a complex tapestry woven from competitive animosity, personality clashes, media narratives, and even financial incentives. Michael Bisping's insights highlight the deep-seated resentment and unresolved issues that fuel this enduring rivalry. The psychological aspects – ego, pride, and the need for validation – play a significant role in maintaining the conflict. Will these two titans of the UFC ever reconcile? Or is this a legacy of rivalry destined to continue for years to come?

What are your thoughts on the enduring Cormier-Jones feud? Share your opinions in the comments below!