The End Of The NFL's Butt-Targeting Rule? The "Tush Push" Remains

Chloe Fitzgerald

5 min read

Post on May 24, 2025

4.3

Share

The Evolution of the NFL's Targeting Rule

Initial Implementation and Intent

The NFL's targeting rule was initially implemented to address the alarming rate of head and neck injuries. The primary goal was to reduce concussions and other severe injuries caused by dangerous hits to the head and neck area. The rule aimed to deter players from leading with their helmet or initiating unnecessary contact to vulnerable areas.

• Initially, the rule focused on hits to the head, neck, and face.
• The emphasis was on helmet-to-helmet contact and launching into a defenseless player.
• The intent was to foster a safer playing environment and protect player health.

Amendments and Interpretations Over Time

Since its inception, the targeting rule has undergone several amendments and clarifications. However, these changes have often been met with further controversies, highlighting inconsistencies in officiating and the rule's application. The interpretation of what constitutes a “targeting” foul has evolved, causing confusion among players, coaches, and fans.

• The 2013 rule change expanded the definition of targeting to include hits to the spine.
• The introduction of video review for targeting calls aimed to increase accuracy but sometimes led to more debate.
• Several high-profile games featured controversial targeting calls, fueling the ongoing discussion about the rule's effectiveness.

The Grey Area of "Butt Targeting"

Hits to the buttocks frequently occupy a grey area in the application of the targeting rule. The difficulty lies in defining a clear boundary between a legal, albeit forceful, tackle and a deliberate targeting foul. The lack of specific language addressing this area contributes significantly to the ongoing debate.

• Many plays involving hits to the buttocks remain unpenalized, leading to accusations of inconsistent officiating.
• Some believe that hits to the buttocks, especially those involving significant force, should be penalized under the existing rule, or under a new amendment.
• The subjective nature of determining intent makes consistent officiating incredibly difficult.

The Persistence of "Tush Pushes": Why the Problem Remains

Lack of Clear Definition

The ambiguity in the current rule's wording is a major contributor to the persistence of "tush pushes." The lack of a precise definition of "butt targeting" allows for significant subjective interpretation by officials, leading to inconsistent calls across games.

• The rule lacks specific criteria for what constitutes a "butt-targeting" foul, leading to varied interpretations.
• Officiating calls often lack transparency, causing frustration among players, coaches, and fans.
• The subjective nature of these calls makes it difficult to ensure fair and consistent enforcement of the rule.

Difficulty in Officiating in Real-Time

Referees face immense challenges in identifying butt-targeting fouls in the fast-paced environment of an NFL game. The speed of the game and the limited viewing angles available to officials make real-time assessment incredibly difficult, even with the use of instant replay.

• The split-second timing of plays makes it difficult for referees to accurately assess intent and the point of contact.
• Instant replay often fails to clarify ambiguous hits, as different angles can provide different perspectives.
• The pressure to make a quick and accurate call in a high-pressure environment contributes to inconsistencies.

The Nature of Football Contact

The inherent physicality of football makes it unrealistic to completely eliminate all contact with the buttocks. Distinguishing between unintentional contact, a forceful but legal tackle, and intentional targeting is crucial but challenging.

• Many instances of contact with the buttocks are accidental and part of the natural flow of the game.
• Determining intent is subjective and relies heavily on the judgment of the referee.
• Balancing player safety with the inherent physicality of the sport remains a significant challenge.

Potential Solutions and Future Directions

Rule Clarification and Refinement

The rule's wording requires significant clarification and refinement to reduce ambiguity and enhance consistent application. More specific language could help define what constitutes a "butt-targeting" foul and provide more objective criteria for officials.

• Adding specific language defining prohibited contact to the buttocks, including force thresholds.
• Clarifying the definition of "intentional targeting" in relation to hits to the buttocks.
• Developing a clearer set of criteria to guide officials in making consistent calls.

Enhanced Officiating Training

More comprehensive and standardized training for NFL referees is crucial to improve the consistency of applying the targeting rule. Improved training methods can help officials better identify and penalize "tush pushes" fairly.

• Implementing more detailed video reviews and case studies of controversial calls.
• Utilizing interactive simulations to enhance decision-making skills in real-time scenarios.
• Providing consistent feedback and performance evaluation to ensure uniform application of the rule.

Technological Advancements

Exploring the use of technology, such as advanced replay systems or sensor technology, could significantly enhance the accuracy of targeting calls, including those involving hits to the buttocks.

• Implementing high-speed cameras and multiple viewing angles for more accurate review.
• Developing sensor technology to capture data on the force and location of impacts.
• Utilizing AI-powered systems to assist officials in real-time analysis of plays.

Conclusion: The Future of the Butt-Targeting Rule

The evolution of the NFL's targeting rule, the persistent issue of "tush pushes," and the proposed solutions all highlight the ongoing need for clearer guidelines and improved officiating. The ambiguity surrounding hits to the buttocks demonstrates a significant gap in the current rule's effectiveness in protecting player safety. Addressing these issues requires a multi-faceted approach involving rule clarification, enhanced officiating training, and potentially the integration of technology.

What are your thoughts on the effectiveness of the NFL's butt-targeting rule? What changes, if any, do you believe are necessary to improve player safety and the consistency of officiating? Share your opinions on NFL butt targeting, the tush push rule, and player safety in the NFL in the comments below. Let's continue the conversation about ensuring a safer game for all players.